Universal Intelligence


Universal intelligence is the beginning or first step of all the cycles. It is the acknowledgement or affirmation of the recognition of a law.

Be Sociable, Share!

This article has 13 comments

  1. David Suskin 12/19/2016, 4:41 pm:

    Just on observation (p1), or any other method of acquiring knowledge, how do we arrive at a triune (ui, uf, umatter), versus matter containing implicitly, ui?
    I can ‘get’ that by stating the triune as it applies to “living matter (p20), and observing death, and the observation of matter NOW behaving differently, therefore stating something has left virtually the same matter that was alive, therefore an intelligence as separate from the matter. Then by extrapolating backward to Universal Matter, the same triune exists. But is it truely observable or justified by logic and not Assumed?

    • David Suskin 10/06/2017, 4:28 pm:

      I repeat myself (see above David Suskin comment)

      • Joe Strauss 10/07/2017, 3:29 pm:

        See my reply to Claude’s comment. Is the Major Premise inductive or deductive? If it is inductive, it can only be corroborated/”proved’ by getting up tomorrow and seeing that the universe is still has all its “properties and actions and is maintained in existence”. That was enough for Reggie to assume that as true (it had existed since the beginning of time) and base his chiropractic/establish it as a principle. Some have chosen to base it on a theological concept, (Myself included), one that is only established by theology/faith/religion. If the day came that the sun rose and principle #1 did not manifest itself, Reggie’s conclusion/inductiive reasoning would have been proved wrong and the 33 principles would be obsolete. So…
        1. Reggie based his philosophy on one induction and 32 deductions.
        2. I base my chiropractic on faith/belief on the Word of God and 33 principles.?religious
        3 BJ/RWS based their philosophy on the principles but mistakenly mixed/concluded that a theological concept was a chiropractic principle.

  2. David Suskin 10/07/2017, 4:11 pm:

    You have spoken about the difference between gnosis (head) and epignosis (heart) where the a priori Experience becomes internalized, actuated, viewpointed.
    The “In” aspect of intelligence wth respect to matter, the separation of i/f/m.
    I understand your analysis. I don’t see where we induce or deduce the “In”, the separation, the potential for the Triune.
    The first appearance of “In” is within the expiration of Life, where matter is basically the same, but something is Gone.
    That is the Only induction of something leaving matter, where what was In it to keep it Living, is now Out, Departed, Seperated.
    I am suggesting that the MP and the word IN is actually based on a later principle. (P18,20).
    That is, at least to me, something before based on observations of something after (logically speaking). This In, that we distinguish in the MP? Since u e/matter is constant, 100%, u intelligence never departs from matter so it is never observed.
    WHERE DOES THE IN, that is defined within the MP, induce from, or deduce from.
    ps. I am not suggesting that ui is God or is not God. Just that apparently is an entity but that it actuates separate from matter, that is my question to resolve

  3. Claude Lessard 10/08/2017, 2:58 pm:

    Why do you not see that universal intelligence is the LAW of organization? As such it is IN universal e/matter… the same as the LAW of attraction of universal e/mattered is IN universal e/matter! These laws and many others can be observed and, through inductive reasoning, can be formulated as principles. –

    – Let me state it this way: A law of organization is IN all universal e/matter continually giving all its electrons, protons and neutrons their configurations and velocities, thus maintaining universal e/matter in existence.

    • William Hollensed 10/10/2017, 2:46 am:

      [Jer 10:12 ESV] 12 It is he who made the earth by his power, who established the world by his wisdom, and by his understanding stretched out the heavens.
      [Jer 51:15 ESV] 15 “It is he who made the earth by his power, who established the world by his wisdom, and by his understanding stretched out the heavens.
      [Heb 1:3 ESV] 3 He is the radiance of the glory of God and the exact imprint of his nature, and he upholds the universe by the word of his power. After making purification for sins, he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high,
      [Isa 40:26 ESV] 26 Lift up your eyes on high and see: who created these? He who brings out their host by number, calling them all by name, by the greatness of his might, and because he is strong in power not one is missing.
      [1Ti 6:13 ESV] 13 I charge you in the presence of God, who gives life to all things, and of Christ Jesus, who in his testimony before Pontius Pilate made the good confession,
      [Heb 1:2 ESV] 2 but in these last days he has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things, through whom also he created the world.
      [Heb 2:10 ESV] 10 For it was fitting that he, for whom and by whom all things exist, in bringing many sons to glory, should make the founder of their salvation perfect through suffering.
      [2Pe 3:3, 11 ESV] 3 knowing this first of all, that scoffers will come in the last days with scoffing, following their own sinful desires. … 11 Since all these things are thus to be dissolved, what sort of people ought you to be in lives of holiness and godliness,
      [1Co 15:27 ESV] 27 For “God has put all things in subjection under his feet.” But when it says, “all things are put in subjection,” it is plain that he is excepted who put all things in subjection under him.
      [Jhn 1:3, 10, 18 ESV] 3 All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. … 10 He was in the world, and the world was made through him, yet the world did not know him. … 18 No one has ever seen God; the only God, who is at the Father’s side, he has made him known.
      [Act 17:24 ESV] 24 The God who made the world and everything in it, being Lord of heaven and earth, does not live in temples made by man,

      • Bill decken 10/11/2017, 1:50 am:

        Charles, well done. I am not certain I get why you are posting them relative to Claude’s comment.

        • William Hollensed 10/12/2017, 4:48 am:

          Claude says matter is organized by a law. I am trying to show there is a lawgiver who upholds all things by His power. He made to work the way it does. Not crediting a personal creator God when His work is obvious demeans Him. And while the scope of chiropractic philosophy does not extend to this area of life it is in my opinion key to the intelligence in our world.

          • Joe Strauss 10/12/2017, 10:49 am:

            Just as we recognize the difference between medicine and chiropractic, we acknowledge the difference between chiropractic and theology and often it is necessary to explain that difference and failure to do it and is not fair to the practice of medicine,chiropractic, theology (belief systems) or to the public. The perceptions of people (including chiropractors does matter. Knowing your, Dr. Decken’s, and my personal belief system, I’m sure you would not want anyone to confuse them with chiropractic or medicine.

          • Claude Lessard 10/12/2017, 10:09 pm:

            It is me WHO chooses to declare that chiropractic is SEPARATE and DISTINCT from EVERYTHING ELSE and is INCLUSIVE of EVERYONE. –

            – When I invite people into my airplane, there’s no need for me to tell them about the law giver of the law of aerodynamics in order to take them from point A to point B. When I invite peole into my office, there no need for me to tell them about the law giver of the law of organization in order to take them from point A to Point B. –

          • Joe Strauss 10/13/2017, 1:57 pm:

            Claude, if you took someone up in your plane who had never flown before,knew nothing about the law of aerodynamic or your knowledge/ability/expereience of flying, would you not give them at least a knowledge about aerodynamics and your ability to fly that plane? Most people in this post modern, post Christian era have no knowledge about God and either have a another religion or none. Or they might mistakenly think it is religion, a pantheistic view, an evolutionary one or an atheistic view. Or they may think it is the Judaeo-Christian concept of the Creator rather than a principle/law of the creature. I think that distinction can be made to most people people (without a long theological sermon) that will give them a better understanding of chiropractic without confusing them with the philosophy that BJ/RWS propounded inthe Green Books. What do you thnk?

          • bill decken 10/13/2017, 4:12 pm:

            I see. Agreed. Thanks.

  4. Claude 10/13/2017, 4:23 pm:


    I do explain those who have never flown before about the three forces making up the law of aerodynamic (lift-drag-power) and I do not need to mention the law Maker. –

    – The same way I explain in my pre-care ORIENTATION about the law of organization (universal intelligence) and the law of ACTIVE organization (innate intelligence) making up one united factor of the triune (the other two being force/information and e/matter). I do not need and never did mention the law Giver in my ORIENTATION. I heard your ORIENTATION many times when we worked together, and I do not recall you mentioning our Creator at all in your ORIENTATION. However, the way I forget things these days… who knows what you said or didn’t say. 😉 –

    – Also, people coming to my office never heard of the green books. They don’t not know the philosophy of BJ/RWS. Again, I see NO reason whatsoever to mention God in the ORIENTATION. –

    – By the way TMITWDITO!!!!!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *



Follow Us

Subscribe to this blog
via RSS or Email: