The Palmer Philosophy Q&A #60

4

What is the difference between taking the philosophy exactly as DD and BJ presented it or taking what they gave us and refining and expanding upon it? How do we insure that in doing the latter we are not changing their original intent? In other word, what truly is the Palmer philosophy, in their own words what was their objective? What were DD, and later BJ, trying to teach us?

Be Sociable, Share!

This article has 4 comments

  1. David Suskin 05/22/2015, 9:49 pm:

    I WILL NOT BE a FLOATER
    I WILL BE a SWIMMER

    • David Suskin 05/24/2015, 10:35 am:

      They where trying to teach us ADIO.
      That educated intelligence sits below innate intelligence as effect and innate intelligence sits above educated intelligence as cause.

      • David Suskin 05/24/2015, 10:51 am:

        1. Chiropractic is unique. It is non-therapeutic.
        2. Chiropractors correct vertebral subluxations, intentionally.
        3. Chiropractic enables the innate intelligence of the body to be better expressed.
        The Green Book Commentaries vol. XIV Chiropractic Text Book RWS
        page 19-20 (Joseph B. Strauss D. C. )

        • Claude Lessard 05/25/2015, 11:59 am:

          Question is for all of us: WHO do we choose to be in relationship with chiropractic? –

          – It is me WHO choose to tell the orientation over and over and over and over and over and over again in as many creative ways as doable and checks spines everyday. TMITWDITO! 😉 –

          – LET US REMEMBER THOSE WHO GAVE UP SO MUCH FOR CHIROPRACTIC TO THRIVE…

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *