## Archimedes, Newton and Chiropractic

1How many times did Archimedes have to sit-in his bathtub to prove his principle of dispalcemnt? How many times did Newton have to be hit on the head with an apple to prove gravity? How many people had to go to the guillotine to prove the body works better with a good nerve supply? How many million more people need to show improvement of medical conditions over the next 120 years to prove that chiropractic adjustments enable the body to work better and live a little better?

As Per:

How many times did Archimedes have to sit-in his bathtub to prove his principle of dispalcemnt?

*****

To prove? Probably more than once. To demonstrate? Once, although he didn’t realize what had happened probably until he measured.

*****

How many times did Newton have to be hit on the head with an apple to prove gravity?

******

To prove? Probabably more than once as the 1st time he might have been taking a dremmel (cat nap), or distracted by some beautiful woman standing in front of him, or?…

To demonstrate? Once.

*****

How many people had to go to the guillotine to prove the body works better with a good nerve supply?

*****

Hate this one. Nerve supply? What about a head, or didn’t bleed to death. I thought we were getting away from the whole brain to tissue cell thing?

*****

How many million more people need to show improvement of medical conditions over the next 120 years to prove that chiropractic adjustments enable the body to work better and live a little better?

*****

Prove?

*****

I thought OC had a deductive proof? Inductive? Ok, guess we’re back to disease and symptoms again. And as long as we’re making such a statement, why does it always have to be A LITTLE BETTER!?

Not to impactful! I thought ii demos to getting out of a 747 and pushing?

Hello? That seems pretty unpactful? NOT! (Sarcasm)

*****

I understand what you’re trying to say, I think.

Answer? Once. But I think its time for some new examples, or a different take on all of this comparing Chiropractic Life Principle P20,P31) with Physically associated principles.

Personally, as wonderful example of deduction, the brick in Lake Michigan raising the water, is the best. Go Blue!

*****

Am I being to literal Dr. Joe with points that you have made before, extensively wrapped in brilliance, in about 30 books?

*****

I’D RATHER BE ASKED HOW MANY TIMES DOES IT TAKE TO TELL THE STORY, TO READ AND REREAD, TO FINALLY FINALLY GET THE BIG IDEA, TO OWN THE BIG IDEA, TO GO BY THE WAY OF ADIO VIEWPOINT WITHOUT QUESTIONING THE VALIDITY

OF MAN HELPNG MAN THRU KNOWLEDGE VS MAN UNDERSTANDING KNOWLEDGES LIMITATIONS AND GETTING IN LINE WITH THE INTENTIONS OF SOME DIVINE PURPOSE.

ADIO VS OIBU

Materially the minority versus the default majority and getting more, worse, more pronounced, day by day