Chiropractic’s Ultimate Fatal Flaw

3

Societies since the beginning of time have acknowledged a fatal flaw. The Greeks from their pantheistic approach interpreted it one way. Christianity describes it another way and explains it’s alternative. Hinduisms another way, (reincarnation) and atheists by absence of existence (their religion) which has no logical, rational or scientific basis (probably why very few chiropractors are atheists and if pressed must admit to agnosticism. In chiropractic (all approaches) we do not ignore it but only address its existence in one way( Principle #24). How you practice chiropractic depends where along the continuum of LOM you want to intersect:
1.TSC wants to address it (LOM) by correcting VS and getting sick people well, knowing they will eventually fail, one way or another.
2. Mixing chiropractic wants to address LOM using TSC to some degree and medical practice to some degree to address the fatal flaw.
All approaches, including OSC need medical care (unless the ultimate fatal flaw (ultimate (LOM) occurs.
3. Even medicine must eventually address the ultimate LOM and their medical procedure is, “pulling the plug”.
4. OSC acknowledges the ultimate fatal flaw. While BJ acknowledged it briefly mentioned how it related to his chiropractic philosophy in his book The Glory of Going On, his book was bout the “glory” he would receive after he “went on”. This blog is about OSC and not the “going on” aspect. That is not a chiropractic philosophical concept but a theological one. So here is the Objective Straight Chiropractic viewpoint:
1. We do not know when the fatal flaw (FF), ultimate LOM will occur.
2.Every person needs the maximum expression of their innate intelligence forces even with the manifestation of their FF.
3 We do not know if their present FF will be a fatal one even if we know that one will occur some (unknown)day.

Be Sociable, Share!
Posted in: Thinking Straight

This article has 3 comments

  1. Richard Doble Jr., D.C. 08/09/2017, 3:23 pm:

    What is LOM?

    • Claude Lessard 08/09/2017, 9:45 pm:

      Richard,

      LOM = LIMITATIONS OF MATTER

  2. Art Rehe 08/15/2017, 11:44 pm:

    Joe,

    I am feeling stupid, but I can not see the point of what you have written.

    What is it you want us to get from this writing?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *