Stupid Statements #109

9

The subluxation is not a “bad” thing but a necessary component of self awareness.-the late Sue Brown, D.C. in her essay The “BIG BAD” SUBLUXATIONS, some years ago wrote this:

Be Sociable, Share!
Posted in: Thinking Straight

This article has 9 comments

  1. David Suskin 12/02/2017, 8:33 am:

    Is “getting adjusted” by an OSC a GOOD thing or a BAD thing?
    Does using ones Will for self knowledge, expression, improvement? (Now there’s a debatable term) provide More Adio Or Oibu viewpoint?
    Is becoming Educated an aquiring experience or a sheading experience? When is a tool a crutch?
    New Age vs Old Age? Man vs Origin? Is it All Good or is there truly Evil?

    • Joe Strauss 12/02/2017, 2:17 pm:

      It ALWAYS depends upon whether it is Good or Bad educated. Educate Brain is an organ that other organs cannot perform.

  2. Matthew Alvord 12/05/2017, 12:04 pm:

    The sublixation itself is always bad. The measurable adaptation related to the interference is always good. When these concepts are intermixed together as “subluxation”, that’s when there is confusion.

    • Joe Strauss 12/05/2017, 3:22 pm:

      The TSC ASSumes in confusion that the subluxation is always corrected and/or the resultant “measurable adaptation” through research is also good. OSC makes no assumption beyond LACVS

  3. David Suskin 12/05/2017, 3:47 pm:

    That is SOME distinction! In other words beyond LACVS, Educated Intelligence is 100% removed from the Chiropractic Objective and therefore practice of.

    • Joe Strauss 12/05/2017, 6:00 pm:

      David the educated brain is an organ which is affected by LOM. tHE ONE AND ONLY addressed by OSC is the one caused by VS (which is a LOM).

    • Joe Strauss 12/07/2017, 5:26 pm:

      David , as an organ ,like any other the eb is subject to LOM

  4. David Suskin 12/05/2017, 6:29 pm:

    The vertebraille analysis of measuring ii directives within muscles as a means to detect subluxation seems to me is a symantic equal to “resultant measurable adaptation”.
    Seems at some point logical assumptions (educated) must be used to evaluate for physical (LAC) solutions to the interference of the expression of metaphysical creations, directives and laws.
    But with just a tad. Being in “the pocket”, in “the groove”, one with the PM, “present time”, “the moment”, The right intention, That extra something (philosophical understanding), ADIO, “the tightrope”
    Some might call it “dumbing down”. Less is more? “KISS”

    • Claude Lessard 12/06/2017, 1:02 am:

      David,

      With all this very good (excellent) rhetoric… it is my hope that you are putting it in practice. It looks like you might JUMP OFF the fence after all. 😉

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *